Banking Customers with Business and Personal Relationships

Data from the 2014 J.D. Power Small Business Banking Satisfaction Study finds that approximately one-third of small business banking customers also have a personal relationship with their primary business banking institution.

These types of ‘cross-functional’ relationships are beneficial for financial institutions. First and foremost, the institution is holding a greater overall ‘share-of-wallet’. Additionally, business banking customers with a personal account report significantly higher satisfaction, loyalty and advocacy metrics (compared to business customers who do NOT also have a personal relationship). However, analysis of study data finds that some banks are struggling to maximize the full ROI of a cross-functional relationship.

For example, as illustrated in the chart below, Bank A is currently not receiving the same positive ‘lift’ when their small business customers also hold personal banking accounts.

TD Bank SBB_v1

Additionally, study data finds that the ability for Bank A to cross-sell their small business customers on personal accounts is lagging peers.

TD Bank SBB_v1_2

There are many potential reasons why a small business owner is unwilling to hold personal accounts with their business banking institution, including but not limited to:

  • Business institution may not be located near the customers home
  • The customer has a long-standing relationship with their personal institution and is currently satisfied
  • ‘Conflict of interest’ – some customers just want to separate their accounts

Regardless of the reason, the ability for the financial institution to provide excellent service and build trustworthy relationships is vital towards the goal of cross-selling business banking customers on personal accounts.

Bookmark and Share

Meeting the Needs of Female Full-Service Investors

The ‘value’ of female investors is growing. As the percentage of females graduating college and opening small businesses increases, so does the proportion of America’s investable assets held by the female population. For investment advisors and firms, their ability to satisfy the unique needs of female investors will help them capture a greater share of the investable assets held by the female population.

Data from the 2014 J.D. Power U.S. Full-Service Investor Satisfaction Study helps to identify some underlying characteristics of female investors. For example, women investors tend to place more value on a ‘trusting’ relationship with an investment advisor, and are more likely to collaborate closely with their investment advisor.

fsi blog post 1

Data also indicates that women investors are more ‘critical’ of advisors that fail to engage them in discussions regarding their investment goals, strategies and performance. For example, when an advisor fails to fully educate a client on their investment portfolio, the negative impact^ on satisfaction is significantly greater among females than males (-104 vs. -76, respectively, on a 1,000-point scale).

fsi post 2

Key takeaways for investment firms and advisors and to consider:

-Firms need to review the way they recruit, train, team and incent advisors to better align with behaviors that will drive stronger long term client relationships with an increasingly diverse set of financial decision makers

– Advisors need to be proactive in developing a meaningful dialogue with women clients to establish personal goals and provide a clear ongoing understanding of how performance connects with those goals

 

^ ‘Impact’ is defined as the difference in satisfaction when the service best practice is met vs. not met

Bookmark and Share

Improving Consistency of Cross-Channel Interactions

With channel usage continuing to evolve within the retail banking and small business banking industries, it is important for banks to focus on delivering a consistent experience across all customer touch-points. Customers interacting with the bank via the website or call center should receive the same level of high-quality service they receive at a branch, and vice versa. However, analysis of data collected by J.D. Power finds plenty of room for financial institutions to further improve the consistency of cross-channel interaction.

One key example is with regards to Problem Resolution. As displayed in the chart below, small business banking customers report considerable differences in their experience depending on the channel used for resolving a problem. While Problem Resolution satisfaction is highest when interacting with branch personnel (tellers, business bankers and managers), there is a steep decline when dealing with call center and online representatives.

sbb post

Data in the chart above is from the 2014 J.D. Power Small Business Banking Satisfaction Study, but it is important to note that similar discrepancies in cross-channel interaction are evident in all financial services studies conducted by J.D. Power (retail banking, mortgage and investment). And these discrepancies are not always related to Problem Resolution, as many other aspects of the banking experience are also prone to cross-channel inconsistency, such as:

-Account initiation

-Clarity of account information

-Method of accessing secure website (PC vs. tablet. vs. Smartphone)

Bookmark and Share

Becoming a Trusted Advisor to Small Business Banking Clients

As identified in the 2014 J.D. Power Small Business Banking Satisfaction Study, one key aspect of the small business banking experience is the relationship with an assigned account manager.

When an account manager is assigned to a small business client, building a strong relationship becomes vital. Ideally, the account manager becomes viewed as a ‘trusted advisor’, which can help the bank maximize the ROI (return-on-investment) of assigning account managers to small business clients. In addition to having a significant impact on customer satisfaction, account managers that are viewed as a ‘trusted advisor’ can also drive increased loyalty and deepen the share-of-wallet customers hold at the bank.

Furthermore, the negative impact of not being viewed a trusted advisor is profound, as satisfaction levels are actually lower than when no account manager is assigned at all (643 vs. 723, respectively, on a 1,000-point scale).

slide1

Data from the Small Business Satisfaction Study also identifies clear steps that small business account managers can take to develop a strong relationship with their clients and improve the perception of them as a trusted advisor, including:

-Take time to engage clients and understand their business

-Initiate contact with clients throughout the year to discussed needs and/or recommend solutions

-Promptly reply to any inquiries from clients and show ‘concern’ for their needs

slide90

The 2014 J.D. Power Small Business Banking Satisfaction Study was released on October 28th, 2014.

 

 

Bookmark and Share

The Impact of Customer Service on Wait Time Satisfaction

Financial institutions often have staffing and queueing models in-place to minimize customer wait times and improve the efficiency of interactions. However, there are still instances where customers are forced to wait in-line at a branch or are placed on-hold before speaking to a call center representative. When traffic is high and customer wait/hold times are necessary, financial institutions can offset wait-time dissatisfaction by providing quality service once the interaction begins.

For example, the chart below looks at call-center satisfaction among credit card customers that waited at least five minutes before speaking to a call center representative. On average, all credit card customers waiting five minutes before speaking to a rep. have a satisfaction score of 775 (on a 1,000-point scale). However, when a customer waits five minutes and is then greeted in a friendly manner by their call center rep., satisfaction increases to 795. And when a customer waits five minutes, is greeted in a friendly manner and the phone rep had their account information ready prior to joining the call, satisfaction increases further to 827. Finally, satisfaction increases even more when the rep. offers additional assistance and thanks the customer for their business – when all four best practices displayed in the chart below are provided, satisfaction among customers waiting five minutes increases from 775 to 835.

Source: 2014 J.D. Power Credit Card Satisfaction Study

14 CCS_DETAILED FINDINGS

Similarly, among retail banking customers, simply greeting customers as they enter the branch can significantly improve satisfaction with wait-times in the teller line. In the chart below, satisfaction among customers who waited 3-4 minutes but received a greeting when entering is 8.60 on a 10-point scale, which is higher than customers that did not have to wait but did not receive a greeting when entering the branch (8.39).

Source: 2014 J.D. Power Retail Banking Satisfaction Study

14 RBS_Branch_Final

 

Bookmark and Share

Incidence and Impact of Perceived Mortgage Servicing ‘Problems’

Based on data from the 2014 J.D. Power Primary Mortgage Servicer Satisfaction Study, the percentage of customers reporting a ‘problem’ with their servicer has declined slightly over the past year (25% reporting a problem vs. 27% in 2013).

Across the individual problem types, there were noticeable reductions in problems such as:

Website

Escrow account information

Repayment/forbearance plan/short-sale.

Conversely, there was a considerable increase in the percentage of fee-related problems reported by mortgage customers (17% vs. 3% in 2013). In response to this, mortgage servicers must ensure that their customer service representatives are well-educated on fee-application policies and are also provided a level of ‘empowerment’ that will allow them to resolve inquiries during the initial contact from a customer.

And while fees are now the most commonly reported problem, it is also important to note that the ‘negative impact’ of fee problems in the mortgage servicing industry is less profound than other types of problems experienced (-22 index points). Perceived ‘customer service’ (-212 index points) and ‘loan modification’ (-132 index points) problems are most impactful, providing mortgage servicers with further evidence of the need to ensure high quality and consistent customer service.

PMS blog

 

Bookmark and Share

Using ‘Key Performance Indicators’ to Improve the Credit Card Customer Experience

In an ideal scenario, credit card issuers would excel at servicing all aspects of the customer experience. However, data from J.D. Power’s Credit Card Satisfaction Study consistently finds that every credit card issuer has both strengths and weaknesses with regards to the level of service provided to their customer base.

And because no issuer has unlimited resources to devote towards improving the customer experience, determining which initiatives should receive top-priority becomes an important piece of strategic planning.

The 2014 Credit Card Satisfaction Study has identified 12 ‘Key Performance Indicators’ (KPI’s) which represent service behaviors that have the greatest individual impact on customer satisfaction. In other words, “if you can’t do everything right, make sure you are doing these things right.”

As a whole, the industry struggles most with educating customers on card terms (i.e. rates, fees, etc.) and simplifying the login process for online account access. Only 50% of credit card customers completely understand their credit card terms, and only 53% of customers report that it is very easy to login to their account. It is also important to note that these are two of the most impactful KPI’s, based on their potential impact on overall satisfaction.

OSAT _8_25

The KPI performance of each individual card issuer varies widely, and each has a unique set of strengths and opportunities. In order to successfully prioritize any investments towards improving customer satisfaction, it is important for each issuer to fully understand which of their metrics have the greatest room for improvement while also understanding the potential ‘impact’ of each metric.

 

Bookmark and Share

Retail Banking ‘Problem Incidence’ Highest among Customers that are Young and Wealthy

Data from the J.D. Power 2014 Retail Banking Satisfaction Study finds that the industry continues to improve upon their ability to prevent problems. In fact, overall problem incidence has declined every year since 2010.

However, data also finds that problem incidence tends to be highest among retail banking customers that are both ‘young’ and ‘wealthy’. For example, over one-fourth (26%) of Affluent Gen Y customers have experienced a problem with their personal banking institution in the past 12 months.

Perhaps more importantly, these young and wealthy customers are less tolerant of perceived ‘problems’ with their current institution – when a problem occurs, they are considerably more likely to say that they ‘definitely/probably will switch’ banks in the next 12 months.

Industry Overview_Final

Young customers, such as those in the Gen Y age segment represent tremendous ‘growth potential’ for financial institutions, particularly if they are already considered to be ‘Affluent’. It is critical for financial institutions to gain a deeper understanding of the problems that these valuable customers are most likely to experience and develop correction action plans to prevent additional problems in the future.

Bookmark and Share